Let's share it!

OFFER! You can ask me to send you this movie which was shipped to me by Induna with the precise purpose of passing it on.
Also this is last month's most visited page: Pakeezah

About me

I'm a French lover of Indian cinema, but I'm also interested in literature, science, art, and reflection in general. This blog will reflect these tastes more or less!

Vendredi 26 janvier 2007 5 26 /01 /2007 00:24
 
 
I’d like to share a few words about Abishek Bachchan. I must say he’s not my favourite actor, he’s probably not a very talented actor (as yet), but what interests me is that he’s a Bollywood phenomenon. That combination of past and future. Heritage and vitality. Let’s do him justice, nevertheless. I haven’t seen all his films, far from it (I’ve seen him in Yuva, Dhai Akshar Prem Ke, Kabhi alvida naa kehna, and Kuch Na Kaho). I found him often not very good (sometimes worse than that), but one film stands out: YUVA. That was a real treat. And mostly, even if the great Mani Ratnam is behind the camera, it’s thanks to Abhishek. The other two actors (Vivek Oberoi, Ajay Devgan) do a good job, but Abhishek steals the show. Was he well directed? Or did the character really inspire him? This Lallan is a great figure, true. And he really puts something in it. It’s interesting to realise that Lallan is an empty shell, a bum, and that precisely he needs to be filled, weighed down. That’s what his friend Sashi (Rani Mukherjee) does, or tries to do, in the film. She fails, or half-fails, but Abhishek succeeds. He fills the character with a life that leaves the spectator full of wonder, and bewilderment. I found myself feeling some of the pangs of remorse Lallan feels when he asks if he will ever be able to become a man, to lead a decent life.
Abhishek’s great body is both an asset, and a burden: in Yuva, he uses it to great purpose. But take Kal ho na ho: what we have is more like a beanpole. It seems he never knows what to do with his six feet three. When he’s dancing, it's there all the time, you can’t forget it, even though the guy dances well. And I understand why Rani wants to leave him in KANK. That demonstration of anger he tries to pull off in their flat is hard to swallow. Which brings us to his acting. I have the feeling he’s always (nearly always) wondering why he’s there. There’s a stare in his eyes, a sort of fixity which he can’t shake off (his two eyes do have a slight disagreement, haven’t they?) He seems to be thinking about something he’s left somewhere, but where? I don’t know whether it’s because he’s not yet shaken the fatherly figure, as lots of people have said. It’s true that when he’s opposite Mr Dad, it’s hard on him (see KANK). Maybe that’s part of the picture. It’s difficult to be Big Amitabh’s heir, having to share the name’s fame (I was going to say, the lion's mane).
 
 
And now he’s marrying the world’s eyes, the sun of beauty that shines on Bollywood… Well, it’s funny if you remember his own slight squint, which I think adds to his charm. A man needs a little defect to make him sexy. But here’s where the phenomenon starts. Abhishek is Bollywood looking at itself, in a way. I mean the guy’s got everything. Not that I envy him, on the contrary. I rather think he deals with it well. There’s no egotism (that I can sense) about him. I like his retired nature, his shyness, his “mystery” (inverted commas because everybody’s got a mystery). He’s the one who has to deal with the heritage, but he’s strong enough to shoulder it. He’s looking for his identity, for his originality. Let’s hope he finds it. What is clear is that he has potential lying dormant. We have to hope that somebody one day will throw open that great chest, and make him use whatever masks are hidden in there. Has life had time yet to fill it, well, who knows? But he still needs to forget himself, to look directly at us, at the camera. He needs to act.
 

Voir les 0 commentaires - Ecrire un commentaire - Communauté : LE PORTAIL DE BOLLYWOOD - Recommander
Mardi 23 janvier 2007 2 23 /01 /2007 23:38
   
I’m very enthusiastic about Bollywood actresses, but perhaps not for the reason you imagine. Of course today’s actresses are beautiful, charming, sexy, clever, the whole works. They’re real artists, and they’re real businesswomen! On their (not so frail) shoulders is placed a good deal of the burden of success. But let’s face it, not as much as in a Western film. Anyhow, what for me characterises the queens of Bollywood, the Preity Zintas, the Rani Mukherjees, the Aishwarya Rais, is a deep sense of availability and friendliness. I feel in them at the same time the presence of a woman and of a friend. It’s such a pleasant and rich feeling. You can fall in love with them, of course, but then that love will be filled with a sense of thankfulness. It won’t be a selfish and desperate love. This love will be filled with the wonder of the eyes, the magic of the smiles, the strange longing for softness and clarity, but it will not be destructive or frantic.
 
With these actresses, in general (it’s difficult to be objective!) you watch them and pretty soon you feel at ease with them. They are close. They aren’t there to take you by surprise, but on the contrary they give you the best of what they have: a warm presence filled with kindness and that special combination of womanhood and motherhood. Indeed I wouldn’t like to forget such lovely actresses as Khiron Kher and Jaya Bachchan, for example, but that womanhood/motherhood is not restricted to older women. I see it in Rani Mukherjee’s sweet eyes (I remember her in Chalte Chalte), in Preity Zinta’s tears (Kal ho na ho), in Kajol’s seated attitude (Fanaa), in Aishwarya Rai’s embrace (Kuch na kaho), in Madhuri Dixit’s steps (Devdas)…It’s something I see in a woman the minute she’s on the screen: a sense of responsibility, a kindness, that particular poise which reassures and provides stability in life.
 
These Bollywood actresses are the spectator’s friends, and this comes, I believe, from their desire to fill their roles with a sense of their womanhood which is both respectful of its Indian values and willing to transcend the limitations of culture and region, to open on human values. In short, it is the way these actresses perform that makes us feel they are our human sisters. And when I say this, I am thinking about actresses who prefer (together with their directors, I suppose) to use their roles in order to attract the attention on themselves, instead of on the humanity they are a part of. If an actress forgets, and makes us forget she is there on the screen to turn us towards a better humanity, I feel she is no longer my friend. If I am made to want to see her body more than her person, she is no longer my friend. But if she uses her body, her beauty, her charm, as elements of the revelation of our common humanity, then she becomes my friend, and even if I love her, I am not in risk of being focused on the signs only of this revelation. I will first thank her for the revelation.
 
Being an actress in Bollywood films is both a feminist and a creative task: the trend is today towards a “hollywoodisation” of women. Resisting this trend will require a inventiveness and a courage that perhaps will be as great as the one needed to extract women from the ageless Indian alienations. It is not by becoming like Western heroines that Bollywood actresses will help emancipating Indian women. It is on the contrary on focussing on what is truly human in their Indian womanhood.
 

Voir les 0 commentaires - Ecrire un commentaire - Communauté : L'UNIVERS DE BOLLYWOOD - Recommander
Jeudi 18 janvier 2007 4 18 /01 /2007 23:36
Bollywood started for me with a selection of films shown on the French TV two years ago, and I was at first simply curious to discover a new sort of movies. One of them was Mani Ratman’s Dil se, with Manisha Koirala that literally blows up on the screen. Interestingly, I read on Imdb (http://www.imdb.com/) a review of this film that matches almost completely my own. It has been written by Tarynblake: Here it is:
 
This was the first actual Bollywood film I've ever seen. I knew nothing about it going in, other than that it was considered a classic and featured "that Indian guy" (Khan) who shows up in every other film. Needless to say, after I became accustomed to the singing and dancing, I was able to dig in to the film a bit. It got slow at times but I was intensely interested in figuring out what the heck was going on. In the final moments of the film, my friend and I just sat frozen. I've never seen a movie that had singing, dancing, and ended with a bang. Needless to say, I'm hooked on Bollywood and determined to make everyone I know watch this film.” (Dil Se...)
 
 
 
Well, that was my beginning too. That dancing and singing, that vibrant life, those colours, that length of action, when we in the West are accustomed to 1h30 or 2h movies, that display of sentiments in their often exaggerated, or stereotyped fashion, but precisely, this simplification of human psychology somehow attracted me. Strange, isn’t it? Because in fact it also meant what I cannot name otherwise than a more innocent type of cinema, or a more decent, if you get my meaning. It isn’t only a question of Bollywood films being less dirty or violent than Western ones, although that is part of it. There is a kind of freshness in most of these films because they deal with central themes of love, marriage, the family, parents and children relationships, friendship, and the like. These themes are life-themes, if I may say, whereas too many Western themes are death-themes. Or themes in which negativity and hopelessness are given a weight that naturally is more difficult to bear (and are perhaps the signature of a nihilist culture which has refused its former transcendent values?). When I say this, I hope I am not giving in to childishness or naivety: we are talking about an art, and Bollywood is, I believe, more on the side of life and joy than Hollywood.
 
I must also discuss the question of sex, since I think it is not only a question of culture, but also of aesthetic choice. It is of course a question of culture, I am not denying this. But even if the fact that in Bollywood films actors don’t kiss on the mouth, and that skin or love-scenes are hardly seen could pass as prudery and lack of realism, I think it enables the spectator to look at actors in a different way. We all know excellent films in which the deeper exploration of a relationship would be very artificial without a foray into intimacy, and that includes love and sex. But the tendency for money-seeking producers is sometimes (often?) to include sex-scenes in films which would not necessarily need them in terms of aesthetic purpose. And so if certain Bollywood films fall in the trap of using this trick to attract spectators, I think you will agree with me that the best of them don’t. Anyhow, my personal position as spectator is less uncomfortable when watching a Bollywood film, because I feel less a hostage to that sort of manipulation.
 
It might sound difficult, after having read all this, to connect it with Dil se, with which I opened the article. Isn’t that a film about a girl terrorist who has lost all hope, has forsaken all joy in life? Where are the spirit, the humour, the charm that characterise Bollywood so well? Well, perhaps Mani Ratman is rather special (I’m saying after having seen only two of his films, agreed) and not mainstream Bollywood. But Dil se has the vibrant emotionality, the dance, the music, and, yes, the values that I enjoy so much. Of course, there is a lot of trash in Bolly films. But I like to think that this doesn’t counterbalance the fundamental stance according to which the pleasure to be found in cinema is on the side of hope and joy.

Voir les 2 commentaires - Ecrire un commentaire - Communauté : L'UNIVERS DE BOLLYWOOD - Recommander
Lundi 15 janvier 2007 1 15 /01 /2007 23:52

 

undefined

I'm a recent Bollywood fan, and I know next to nothing about oldies! I'm sure there are treasures there, but for me they're still to be unearthed... Please if some of you have suggestions, don't hesitate!

So... Best Bolly film? Why not Monsoon Wedding? In that film, I appreciated almost everything: the acting, the filming, the story, the perspective on Indian culture and practices, the humour, the realistic Delhi shots. There was next to no concessions to facile effects, and on the contrary a lot of intelligence and tact as concerns the issue of education and marriage. These questions are so often dealt with in a gross manner that it's important to note the difference here.

By gross, I mean not only distasteful, but also without depth. Anybody who has seen Bollywood films realises how crucial the question of education is: what are boys and girls told about the realities (I'm tempted to say: the real realities) of the other sex? In this film we see a father (Naseeruddin Shah, excellent) defend his daughter against his brother whom he suspects of paedophilia, and face the expectant looks of the stunned family around him. That sort of scene deserves more than praise, I think. It'll take more than cinema to change male-dominated practices, I'm sure, but what is suggested here is that the essence of the person is more important than family ties and money. Because we can imagine that by exposing his rich brother who was offering to pay for his daughter's studies in, this father (and the daughter, who summoned enough courage to start the scandal) loses this unique possibility.

Monsoon Wedding is not the first film to address the question of forgiveness and open-mindedness concerning past mistakes of one (or two) of the promised ones. What is shown in this film (the scene of the avowal followed by the reconciliation, even if the latter is too precipitated) is the victory of actual love over sentimental infatuation. True, Aditi (Vasundhara Das) falls for Hemant (Parvin Dabas) too fast: the night before she was in another man’s embrace. But after all, this is , and she knows that she will have to abandon the lover for the chosen husband. She is prepared to be married against her will, and suddenly a few words change her heart: she is accepted as she is, defiled, some would say, because she has not waited for her husband. Condemned because she has loved with body and soul. One might say she is responsible in part, but one might also forgive, and look towards the future. That's what Mira Nair suggests.

Another beautiful story is that which brings together the party organiser and the little maid. She rises and he stoops, she dreams and he apologises, and then there is this amazing scene in which he offers his heart in front of a ludicrous stand full of lights and flowers (perhaps all this has a cultural meaning that escapes me, but I found it just "too much", but precisely, it was the right quantity, because there is never too much love).


Voir les 1 commentaires - Ecrire un commentaire - Communauté : L'UNIVERS DE BOLLYWOOD - Recommander
Lundi 15 janvier 2007 1 15 /01 /2007 22:57

Hi everyone

I've been a Bollywood fan for some time now, so I thought I would like to share my pleasure with you guys out there who also enjoy Bollywood films and songs. I don't know exactly what I'll do, but one idea will probably be to exchange around films, about film-makers, actors, songs, singers... well, in fact what most people do!
But even though I'm a fan, I won't indulge much in glamourizing and I intend to be rather critical... Well, we'll see.
Let's have fun, and share our impressions and emotions!

 

Voir les 0 commentaires - Recommander

Subscribe to the posts

  • Flux RSS des articles
Créer un blog gratuit sur OverBlog - Contact - C.G.U. - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés